The Play of Meanings: Guerin’s Critical Approaches to Literature

Introduction

The Play of Meanings lies at the centre of modern literary theory, capturing the shift from order to openness in how texts are read and understood. Wilfred L. Guerin’s A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature has long served as a standard textbook for exploring such shifts in interpretation. It introduces readers to the evolution of critical thought—from the structured logic of Structuralism to the self-questioning dynamics of Post-structuralism.

Structuralism sought patterns, systems, and frameworks within literature, treating meaning as something stable and discoverable. It believed that every story, image, or motif could be decoded to reveal an underlying structure. Yet Post-structuralism challenged this very stability. It emphasised that language itself is slippery, filled with contradictions, ambiguities, and multiple possibilities. Instead of chasing order, readers are invited to engage with play—the endless interaction of meanings that resist closure.

At its core, this transition teaches that meaning is not a rock but a liquid. It flows, evolves, and reshapes itself each time a text is read or reinterpreted. Through this lens, Guerin’s handbook underscores that literature does not contain fixed truths but offers spaces where meanings continuously move, merge, and transform.

What Is “Play”? (Derrida’s Concept)

The play of meanings becomes most vivid in Jacques Derrida’s idea of play—a central principle in post-structuralist thought. Traditionally, Western philosophy has always searched for a centre—a fixed point such as God, Truth, Reason, or The Author—that guarantees stability and meaning. This “centre” provided order, making the universe, and by extension, a literary text, seem coherent and controlled.

However, Derrida challenged this tradition through a process known as ‘decentring’. As Wilfred L. Guerin explains in A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature, Derrida decentred the universe by rejecting the idea of any absolute or final truth. If there is no ultimate reference point, then words no longer point to fixed meanings—they merely lead to other words. Language, therefore, becomes a self-referential system without a stable core.

A helpful way to imagine this is through the dictionary analogy. When you look up a word in a dictionary, you find only more words. Each carries its own definitions that, in turn, refer to yet more words. There is no final anchor that delivers “the thing itself”. This infinite movement and deferral of meaning is what Derrida calls the play of meanings.

“This analysis is based on Wilfred Guerin’s standard textbook. It explains complex ideas like Deconstruction with actual examples.

[Buy A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature on Amazon].”

Key Terms in This Approach

The Play of Meanings in Derrida’s philosophy introduces several key ideas that reshape how we read texts and understand language. Wilfred L. Guerin’s A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature explains these terms as essential to grasping post-structuralist criticism.

Logocentrism: This term refers to the Western tendency to search for one central logos—a single Word, Truth, or Principle that grounds meaning. Western philosophy often assumes such a centre exists, but deconstruction challenges this assumption. Derrida argues that no word or truth can stand outside language to stabilise meaning, because every “truth” is produced within the system it claims to explain.

Binary Oppositions: Guerin emphasises that human thought relies on paired opposites such as Good/Evil, Light/Dark, Male/Female, or Reason/Emotion. Traditionally, one side of the pair is viewed as superior, forming a hierarchy that shapes culture and ideology. Deconstruction exposes how these binaries are unstable and interconnected, showing that each term depends on the other for its identity.

The Twist: Rather than simply reversing these hierarchies, deconstruction reveals their fragility. It shows that what seems “primary” or “superior” depends on the very idea it tries to dominate. Meaning, therefore, becomes fluid and open to reinterpretation.

Différance: A term Derrida deliberately spelt with an a to mark the impossibility of fixing meaning.  Différance combines two ideas—difference (how words differ from one another) and deferral (how meaning is always postponed). Every word gains meaning not from a direct reference but from its relation to other words and the endless delay in reaching a final signified.

How to Apply “The Play of Meanings” to a Text

The Play of Meanings is not just a theory—it’s a practical tool students can use when analysing any literary text. Post-structuralism, as explained by Wilfred L. Guerin in A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature, encourages readers to uncover the hidden contradictions and uncertainties that make meaning fluid and unstable. Here’s how you can apply this approach step by step.

Step 1: Find the Aporia
An aporia is a moment of doubt, confusion, or contradiction within the text. Look for places where the author’s message becomes unclear or self-contradictory. This is where the text begins to question its own meaning. For instance, a narrator who preaches honesty but tells lies creates an aporia that unsettles readers’ trust.

Step 2: Look for the Slip
Every text reveals points where language “slips”, showing more than the author may have intended. This can be a phrase, image, or metaphor that undermines the surface message. For example, a poem that celebrates nature but relies on industrial metaphors might unintentionally expose tension between purity and pollution. Such slips demonstrate how multiple meanings coexist beneath the surface.

Step 3: Show the Instability
Once you find these contradictions and slips, show how they destabilise the overall meaning. Instead of one unified interpretation, the text now holds several possible meanings that conflict and overlap. This is the play of meanings in action—the point where language resists final closure and invites readers to see interpretation as an open-ended process.

“The idea of ‘Play’ is very similar to Umberto Eco’s concept of the ‘Open Work.’ Both agree that the reader creates meaning.

Read our analysis of [Umberto Eco’s The Open Work] to see the connection.”

Example Analysis (As Used in Guerin)

The play of meanings becomes clearer when applied to a classic literary text. In A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature, Wilfred L. Guerin demonstrates how a Deconstructionist reading focuses not on uncovering the unity of a work but on exposing its disunity—the inner tensions and contradictions that unsettle any fixed meaning.

Take Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Young Goodman Brown. A traditional interpretation might read the story as a moral allegory about the loss of faith, emphasising its structural coherence and clear message. A Deconstructionist, however, looks for instability. Goodman Brown’s vision in the forest—whether a dream or reality—creates uncertainty that the story never resolves. The text both condemns and justifies doubt, leaving readers torn between moral lessons and psychological confusion. This tension between belief and scepticism produces the play of meanings, where no single truth stands firm.

Similarly, in Andrew Marvell’s poem To His Coy Mistress, a conventional reading sees persuasive unity in the carpe diem argument—“seize the day” before time runs out. Yet a Deconstructionist reading uncovers contradictory tones. The speaker’s appeal to passion relies on rational calculation and fear of decay, undermining the sincerity of his desire. Language that seems seductive also becomes manipulative, blurring the line between love and logic. The poem’s rhetorical elegance hides an unresolved clash of meanings.

Thus, the Deconstructionist does not attempt to close the text around one stable idea. Instead, they reveal how the text’s own language plays against itself, generating layers of uncertainty. In this approach, meaning is never one—it constantly shifts, folds, and unfolds within the text’s contradictions.

Conclusion

The play of meanings does not aim to destroy literature or dismiss the value of interpretation. Instead, it seeks to open texts to infinite possibilities. As Wilfred L. Guerin emphasises in A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature, deconstruction encourages readers to move beyond fixed interpretations and embrace the richness of ambiguity. Every text contains multiple voices, conflicting ideas, and shifting perspectives that resist closure.

This approach transforms reading from a search for certainty into an act of exploration. It challenges students and critics to stop looking for the “teacher’s answer” or a single, authoritative meaning. Instead, it invites them to engage with the text’s complexity—its tensions, contradictions, and surprises. In doing so, the play of meanings celebrates literature as a living, dynamic space where interpretation never ends but continually renews itself with every reading.

FAQS